Call-for-ProposalsPrevention Envelope of the Transition Support Facility (TSF) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Transition States Coordination Office (RDTS) of the African Development Bank Group (the ‘Bank’) is pleased to announce the launch of the following Call-for-Proposals (CfP) under the Prevention Envelope of the Transition Support Facility (TSF), implemented within the seventeen-replenishment cycle of the African Development Fund (ADF-17). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overview of the TSF Prevention Envelope The Prevention Envelope represents a strategic evolution in the TSF. It was introduced in 2023 and operationalized during the ADF-16 cycle, in line with the Bank’s Strategy for Addressing Fragility and Building Resilience in Africa (2022-2026).It is also strongly aligned with the Ten Year Strategy (TYS), which perceives peace and security as public goods, as well as the strategic ambitions of the Bank’s Four Cardinal Points (CP). It prioritizes early implementation and long-term resilience building, targeting potential vulnerabilities at institutional, community, and economic levels. The Prevention Envelope focuses on upstream, anticipatory, and risk-informed interventions that address structural drivers of fragility before they escalate into crises. It supports results-oriented and peace-positive investments that strengthen local capacities, reinforce trust in institutions, and reduce exposure to shocks. This approach reflects the principle that prevention is the most cost-effective and sustainable pathway to peace, stability, and development. The aim is to further promote integrated approaches across the humanitarian-development-peace nexus (HDP) and advance regional and cross-border interventions where fragility risks transcend national boundaries. Through strategic partnerships, co-financing, and a mix of financial instruments, the Prevention Envelope seeks to maximize impact, scale proven solutions, and catalyze transformative change in fragile and high-risk environments. The 2024 Revised Operational Guidelines of the TSF provide the overarching framework governing the operational modalities of the Prevention Envelope. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core Thematic Areas and Cross-Cutting Considerations This Call for Proposals (CfP) under the TSF Prevention Envelope focuses onthree core thematic areasselected and agreed during the ADF-17 discussion: (1) Food Security and Resilient Food Systems; (2) Enhanced Economic Governance and Institutional Resilience; and (3) Private Sector Development and Job Creation. These thematic areas address interrelated structural challenges that are characteristic of fragile settings and closely linked to the onset, persistence, or escalation of crises. The CfP adopts a prevention-oriented approach to address these interlinked risks. Strengthening resilient food systems reduces vulnerability to shocks; enhancing economic governance improves institutional capacity and accountability; and promoting private sector development and job creation expands inclusive economic opportunities. Together, these considerations aim to mitigate the structural pressures that drive instability, displacement, and irregular migration, contributing to sustained resilience and stability. In line with ADF-17 policy commitments, proposals are encouraged to contribute to the development, operationalization, or implementation of National Prevention Strategies or equivalent national prevention frameworks. This is intended to serve as a central policy instrument for addressing structural drivers of fragility, strengthening anticipatory and risk-informed governance, and enhancing institutional capacities for prevention. In countries where a national prevention framework has already been adopted, proposals should clearly articulate how project activities align with and contribute to the implementation of the framework’s priorities. In countries where such a framework is under development or not yet operational, proposals are expected to incorporate activities that support its formulation, updating, or operationalization, including through strengthened early warning systems, risk analysis capacities, anticipatory action mechanisms and action plan for the strategy. Core Thematic Areas
Food insecurity remains a chronic and destabilizing force across Africa. While conflict is rarely driven by a single factor, evidence shows that food insecurity can significantly contribute to instability by deepening grievances, intensifying competition over land and water, and amplifying the impacts of climate and economic shocks. Rising food prices, income loss, unemployment, and climate-related disruptions to food systems are key structural drivers linking food insecurity and conflict. This thematic area is closely aligned with CP 3 (Turn Demographics into a Dividend) by tackling rural challenges through investments in productive employment, SME development, and income-generating activities, particularly for youth and women. It also advances CP 4 (Build Resilient Infrastructure and Competitive Value Chains) by reinforcing agricultural value chains end-to-end, spanning logistics corridors, storage infrastructure, and processing capacity. Therefore, proposals under this thematic area should aim to advance food availability, access, utilization, and stability in ways that are preventive, conflict-sensitive, and peace-positive, while addressing these structural drivers. Priority interventions may include strengthening anticipatory and climate-resilient food systems, including through forecast-based financing and early warning action; promoting equitable and sustainable natural resource management to reduce resource-related conflict; and reinforcing local, national, and regional food systems and market linkages to mitigate food price volatility and livelihood shocks. In pastoral contexts, proposals should also consider how livestock markets, export corridors, and cross-border trade can serve as stabilizing economic infrastructure.
Weak institutions remain significant drivers of instability across Africa, particularly in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. When institutions lack the capacity, transparency, or legitimacy to manage public resources, regulate economic activity, and deliver services equitably, grievances deepen and trust between citizens and the state erodes. Economic mismanagement, corruption, illicit financial flows, and exclusionary economic policies can exacerbate inequality, undermine social cohesion, and heighten vulnerability to economic and political shocks. Particular attention should be given to strengthening anticipatory governance systems, including early warning, risk monitoring, and preventive policy responses. This thematic area is closely aligned with CP 2 (Rebuild Africa’s Financial Sovereignty) and the New African Financial Architecture for Development (NAFAD) by supporting policy reforms that strengthen key economic governance systems in countries. It also indirectly advances CP 1 (Unlock Africa Capital Power) as strong economic institutions will inform capital allocation decision in countries and strengthen long term sustainability rather than exacerbating fragilities. Proposals under this thematic area should aim to mobilize and utilize public and private resources in ways that are preventive, conflict-sensitive, and peace-positive. Examples of targeted proposals include improvement of macroeconomic management, more equitable resource distribution, healthier fiscal positions, and strengthened state capacity. This may include efforts to support resilient labor markets, inclusive economic policies, and constructive international engagement that enhances domestic economic management. Institutional resilience refers to the capacity of state institutions to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, and withstand the risks of conflict and economic shocks. Proposals may include efforts to strengthen public financial management, domestic capital mobilization, and oversight systems; reinforce accountability and integrity in financial, trade, and customs governance; improve coordination and implementation of economic policy at national, subnational, and regional levels; and strengthen the rule of law. Overall, supported actions should demonstrate a clear contribution to reducing structural economic risks, reinforcing state–society relations, and sustaining long-term stability. Regional cooperation and integration efforts, particularly those aligned with the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), are encouraged where they reinforce institutional resilience, economic inclusion, and stability.
Sustainable peace and resilience in fragile and high-risk environments depend on the expansion of inclusive, productive, and decent economic opportunities, particularly for youth and women. This thematic area seeks to support initiatives that strengthen the foundations for private sector–led growth by mobilizing capital at scale, reducing investment risks, and enabling resilient economic transformation as a driver of prevention, stability, andpeace. It also emphasizes the deployment of innovative financing mechanisms that crowd in private capital and unlock investment opportunities in fragile contexts This thematic area is strongly aligned with CP 1 (Unlock Africa’s Capital Power) by promoting innovative financing mechanisms that channel capital into productive sectors, promotes de-risk investments, and strengthen partnerships with financial institutions and investors in fragile contexts. It also advances CP 3 (Turn Demographics into a Dividend) by generating inclusive economic opportunities, particularly for youth and women, through entrepreneurship and innovation support, skills development, and the growth of MSMEs. Therefore, proposals under this thematic should aim to transform enabling economic and financial systems by addressing structural barriers that constrain productive economic participation and private investment in fragile contexts. Illustrative interventions may include but are not limited to formalization of informal economic activities; demand-based support to MSMEs and youth-led enterprises; promotion of digitalization, innovation, and technology; development of regional value chains and cross-border trade; and partnerships with financial intermediaries and financing platforms. Priority will be given to initiatives that expand equitable economic participation for youth and women, strengthen entrepreneurship and enterprise ecosystems, improve conditions for private investment, and develops innovative local financing channels such as such as remittance-based instruments and community-based investment schemes. Proposals are encouraged to incorporate measures to enhance the economic inclusion in displacement settings, including support for legal work rights, access to finance with nontraditional identification, cross border recognition of skills and asset certifications, and improved market linkages for both forcibly displaced persons and host communities. Proposals should make use of partnerships, co-financing, promote innovative financing, and strengthen regional economic integration. It’s also important to ensure alignment with continental and regional frameworks, such as the AfCFTA, when applicable. Cross-Cutting Considerations
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funding and Resources The prevention envelope funding maintains a ceiling of UA 20 million per project. Resources can be implemented through the full range of financial instruments available under the ADF, ranging from sovereign investment operations to program-based operations and guarantees. To achieve synergies and maximize results, it is also encouraged to consider a combination of different instruments that encompass direct investments, accompanying reforms, and institutional capacity building. Priority will be given to proposals that demonstrate strong catalytic potential by mobilizing public and/or private investment and leveraging additional resources through external co-financing. TSF resources should be used strategically to de-risk investments, crowd in capital, and maximize impact beyond the initial allocation. Structured partnerships with multilateral institutions, bilateral financiers, government counterparts, and private sector entities will be viewed favorably, particularly where proposals demonstrate clear financial additionality, credible leverage, and pathways to scale and sustainability. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Eligibility The TSF Prevention Envelope offers merit-based support to all ADF-eligible countries. The list below provides the countries eligible for this CfP, along with their associated financing terms in 2026. It also highlights the countries identified by the Bank as transition states under ADF-17. For information on financing terms, applicants may consult the Bank’s Partnerships and Resource Mobilization Department (FIRM).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Proposal Requirements To be eligible for consideration, applications must meet the following pre-requisites:
NB:Proposals prepared in coordination with UN Agencies for a given country are encouraged to be limited to a maximum of three applications and be endorsed by the respective Resident Coordinator’s Office. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection Criteria A selection process will evaluate proposals based on the following criteria to identify projects with strong potential to generate impactful results, prevent fragility and conflict, and contribute to resilience, social cohesion, and sustainable development.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeline The timeline of the CfP process is as follows:
Due to high volume of applications expected, the Bank will be able to provide individual updates to all applicants regarding the status of their submissions. Only successful applications will receive notification emails following the announcement of the selection results. |
2026 Prevention Envelope of the Transition Support Facility
Call-for-ProposalsPrevention Envelope of the Transition Support Facility (TSF) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Transition States Coordination Office (RDTS) of the African Development Bank Group (the ‘Bank’) is pleased to announce the launch of the following Call-for-Proposals (CfP) under the Prevention Envelope of the Transition Support Facility (TSF), implemented within the seventeen-replenishment cycle of the African Development Fund (ADF-17). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overview of the TSF Prevention Envelope The Prevention Envelope represents a strategic evolution in the TSF. It was introduced in 2023 and operationalized during the ADF-16 cycle, in line with the Bank’s Strategy for Addressing Fragility and Building Resilience in Africa (2022-2026).It is also strongly aligned with the Ten Year Strategy (TYS), which perceives peace and security as public goods, as well as the strategic ambitions of the Bank’s Four Cardinal Points (CP). It prioritizes early implementation and long-term resilience building, targeting potential vulnerabilities at institutional, community, and economic levels. The Prevention Envelope focuses on upstream, anticipatory, and risk-informed interventions that address structural drivers of fragility before they escalate into crises. It supports results-oriented and peace-positive investments that strengthen local capacities, reinforce trust in institutions, and reduce exposure to shocks. This approach reflects the principle that prevention is the most cost-effective and sustainable pathway to peace, stability, and development. The aim is to further promote integrated approaches across the humanitarian-development-peace nexus (HDP) and advance regional and cross-border interventions where fragility risks transcend national boundaries. Through strategic partnerships, co-financing, and a mix of financial instruments, the Prevention Envelope seeks to maximize impact, scale proven solutions, and catalyze transformative change in fragile and high-risk environments. The 2024 Revised Operational Guidelines of the TSF provide the overarching framework governing the operational modalities of the Prevention Envelope. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core Thematic Areas and Cross-Cutting Considerations This Call for Proposals (CfP) under the TSF Prevention Envelope focuses onthree core thematic areasselected and agreed during the ADF-17 discussion: (1) Food Security and Resilient Food Systems; (2) Enhanced Economic Governance and Institutional Resilience; and (3) Private Sector Development and Job Creation. These thematic areas address interrelated structural challenges that are characteristic of fragile settings and closely linked to the onset, persistence, or escalation of crises. The CfP adopts a prevention-oriented approach to address these interlinked risks. Strengthening resilient food systems reduces vulnerability to shocks; enhancing economic governance improves institutional capacity and accountability; and promoting private sector development and job creation expands inclusive economic opportunities. Together, these considerations aim to mitigate the structural pressures that drive instability, displacement, and irregular migration, contributing to sustained resilience and stability. In line with ADF-17 policy commitments, proposals are encouraged to contribute to the development, operationalization, or implementation of National Prevention Strategies or equivalent national prevention frameworks. This is intended to serve as a central policy instrument for addressing structural drivers of fragility, strengthening anticipatory and risk-informed governance, and enhancing institutional capacities for prevention. In countries where a national prevention framework has already been adopted, proposals should clearly articulate how project activities align with and contribute to the implementation of the framework’s priorities. In countries where such a framework is under development or not yet operational, proposals are expected to incorporate activities that support its formulation, updating, or operationalization, including through strengthened early warning systems, risk analysis capacities, anticipatory action mechanisms and action plan for the strategy. Core Thematic Areas
Food insecurity remains a chronic and destabilizing force across Africa. While conflict is rarely driven by a single factor, evidence shows that food insecurity can significantly contribute to instability by deepening grievances, intensifying competition over land and water, and amplifying the impacts of climate and economic shocks. Rising food prices, income loss, unemployment, and climate-related disruptions to food systems are key structural drivers linking food insecurity and conflict. This thematic area is closely aligned with CP 3 (Turn Demographics into a Dividend) by tackling rural challenges through investments in productive employment, SME development, and income-generating activities, particularly for youth and women. It also advances CP 4 (Build Resilient Infrastructure and Competitive Value Chains) by reinforcing agricultural value chains end-to-end, spanning logistics corridors, storage infrastructure, and processing capacity. Therefore, proposals under this thematic area should aim to advance food availability, access, utilization, and stability in ways that are preventive, conflict-sensitive, and peace-positive, while addressing these structural drivers. Priority interventions may include strengthening anticipatory and climate-resilient food systems, including through forecast-based financing and early warning action; promoting equitable and sustainable natural resource management to reduce resource-related conflict; and reinforcing local, national, and regional food systems and market linkages to mitigate food price volatility and livelihood shocks. In pastoral contexts, proposals should also consider how livestock markets, export corridors, and cross-border trade can serve as stabilizing economic infrastructure.
Weak institutions remain significant drivers of instability across Africa, particularly in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. When institutions lack the capacity, transparency, or legitimacy to manage public resources, regulate economic activity, and deliver services equitably, grievances deepen and trust between citizens and the state erodes. Economic mismanagement, corruption, illicit financial flows, and exclusionary economic policies can exacerbate inequality, undermine social cohesion, and heighten vulnerability to economic and political shocks. Particular attention should be given to strengthening anticipatory governance systems, including early warning, risk monitoring, and preventive policy responses. This thematic area is closely aligned with CP 2 (Rebuild Africa’s Financial Sovereignty) and the New African Financial Architecture for Development (NAFAD) by supporting policy reforms that strengthen key economic governance systems in countries. It also indirectly advances CP 1 (Unlock Africa Capital Power) as strong economic institutions will inform capital allocation decision in countries and strengthen long term sustainability rather than exacerbating fragilities. Proposals under this thematic area should aim to mobilize and utilize public and private resources in ways that are preventive, conflict-sensitive, and peace-positive. Examples of targeted proposals include improvement of macroeconomic management, more equitable resource distribution, healthier fiscal positions, and strengthened state capacity. This may include efforts to support resilient labor markets, inclusive economic policies, and constructive international engagement that enhances domestic economic management. Institutional resilience refers to the capacity of state institutions to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, and withstand the risks of conflict and economic shocks. Proposals may include efforts to strengthen public financial management, domestic capital mobilization, and oversight systems; reinforce accountability and integrity in financial, trade, and customs governance; improve coordination and implementation of economic policy at national, subnational, and regional levels; and strengthen the rule of law. Overall, supported actions should demonstrate a clear contribution to reducing structural economic risks, reinforcing state–society relations, and sustaining long-term stability. Regional cooperation and integration efforts, particularly those aligned with the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), are encouraged where they reinforce institutional resilience, economic inclusion, and stability.
Sustainable peace and resilience in fragile and high-risk environments depend on the expansion of inclusive, productive, and decent economic opportunities, particularly for youth and women. This thematic area seeks to support initiatives that strengthen the foundations for private sector–led growth by mobilizing capital at scale, reducing investment risks, and enabling resilient economic transformation as a driver of prevention, stability, andpeace. It also emphasizes the deployment of innovative financing mechanisms that crowd in private capital and unlock investment opportunities in fragile contexts This thematic area is strongly aligned with CP 1 (Unlock Africa’s Capital Power) by promoting innovative financing mechanisms that channel capital into productive sectors, promotes de-risk investments, and strengthen partnerships with financial institutions and investors in fragile contexts. It also advances CP 3 (Turn Demographics into a Dividend) by generating inclusive economic opportunities, particularly for youth and women, through entrepreneurship and innovation support, skills development, and the growth of MSMEs. Therefore, proposals under this thematic should aim to transform enabling economic and financial systems by addressing structural barriers that constrain productive economic participation and private investment in fragile contexts. Illustrative interventions may include but are not limited to formalization of informal economic activities; demand-based support to MSMEs and youth-led enterprises; promotion of digitalization, innovation, and technology; development of regional value chains and cross-border trade; and partnerships with financial intermediaries and financing platforms. Priority will be given to initiatives that expand equitable economic participation for youth and women, strengthen entrepreneurship and enterprise ecosystems, improve conditions for private investment, and develops innovative local financing channels such as such as remittance-based instruments and community-based investment schemes. Proposals are encouraged to incorporate measures to enhance the economic inclusion in displacement settings, including support for legal work rights, access to finance with nontraditional identification, cross border recognition of skills and asset certifications, and improved market linkages for both forcibly displaced persons and host communities. Proposals should make use of partnerships, co-financing, promote innovative financing, and strengthen regional economic integration. It’s also important to ensure alignment with continental and regional frameworks, such as the AfCFTA, when applicable. Cross-Cutting Considerations
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funding and Resources The prevention envelope funding maintains a ceiling of UA 20 million per project. Resources can be implemented through the full range of financial instruments available under the ADF, ranging from sovereign investment operations to program-based operations and guarantees. To achieve synergies and maximize results, it is also encouraged to consider a combination of different instruments that encompass direct investments, accompanying reforms, and institutional capacity building. Priority will be given to proposals that demonstrate strong catalytic potential by mobilizing public and/or private investment and leveraging additional resources through external co-financing. TSF resources should be used strategically to de-risk investments, crowd in capital, and maximize impact beyond the initial allocation. Structured partnerships with multilateral institutions, bilateral financiers, government counterparts, and private sector entities will be viewed favorably, particularly where proposals demonstrate clear financial additionality, credible leverage, and pathways to scale and sustainability. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Eligibility The TSF Prevention Envelope offers merit-based support to all ADF-eligible countries. The list below provides the countries eligible for this CfP, along with their associated financing terms in 2026. It also highlights the countries identified by the Bank as transition states under ADF-17. For information on financing terms, applicants may consult the Bank’s Partnerships and Resource Mobilization Department (FIRM).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Proposal Requirements To be eligible for consideration, applications must meet the following pre-requisites:
NB:Proposals prepared in coordination with UN Agencies for a given country are encouraged to be limited to a maximum of three applications and be endorsed by the respective Resident Coordinator’s Office. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection Criteria A selection process will evaluate proposals based on the following criteria to identify projects with strong potential to generate impactful results, prevent fragility and conflict, and contribute to resilience, social cohesion, and sustainable development.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeline The timeline of the CfP process is as follows:
Due to high volume of applications expected, the Bank will be able to provide individual updates to all applicants regarding the status of their submissions. Only successful applications will receive notification emails following the announcement of the selection results. |